Layer One, The Nature of Existence:
Speed of Light vs. Speed of Truth
- Speed of truth is non-existent, because it is existence - in existing, being, no motion is involved. Existence is Truth. Only existence moves more quickly than light.
- So.. untruths are what? Besides unnatural.
- Does light pass through all dimensions?
Consciousness and Dimensions
- Necessary to existence; no consciousness without dimensions of which and within which to be conscious, no existence without a consciousness to be aware of it.
- Therefore... dimensions are not existence; dimensions are what exist. Dimensions are what consciousness is aware of, and awareness of dimensions equals existence.
The Nature of Dimensions
- Progression of dimensions (not as defined by whoever defined them in the first place, but by a logical progression - and remember that every line contains an infinite number of points):
1st Dimension - is Nothing; it is a point with no dimensions, one specific point, and all of the entire first dimension. Without nothing, nothing would exist.
2nd Dimension - take Nothing, the point, and cause it to exist outside of itself, "drag" it and have it persist, exist concurrently, at each point on the line that it traveled. Now there is a dimension to the dimensionless; nothing stretched.
3rd Dimension - big surprise here, take this nothing stretched, this line, and do the same. Yay; once a line of points, now a line of lines.
4th Dimension - A line of lines of lines of points.
5th Dimension - The fourth dimension dragged and made to persist at each point during which it existed, concurrently; "time," as we know it. Chock full of the fourth, like every other greater dimension.
Layer Two, What makes us Human:
Consciousness/Awareness
- Is the frontier between a spiritual entity and a(n) (m)animal brain.
- Identity is stored in the brain.
- Nirvana would be existing only now; all memory and anticipation would have to cease (the brain?).
Layer Three, What We're Doing as Humans:
Corruption of Language
- Corruption of "god," ("God" still holds some of its integrity; could be because a believer capitalizes it out of reverence, but a heretic may not deign to honor the word with a proper stance) now of "love." To what end?
- Is it universal?
Social Evolution
- Laughter, as a reaction to the pain of another, is an effective way to override potentially painful empathy.
Work
In
Progress
2 comments:
Your definitions of dimensions aren't sensible. Specifically I'm referring to the first, and the rest follow. To say that the first is "nothing" means that it doesn't exist. To have "nothing" represent something is a bastardization of terms, when you're reifying "nothing" into "something." A point is a point precisely because it is dimensionless. To ascribe a dimension to dimensionless seems silly, no?
I've since (prior to reading your comment) edited my own, non-posted copy of that masterpiece to start the graduation of the dimensions at zero.
What I am describing, what I am trying to convey my understanding of (rarely do I "get it across" the first time with any one companion; I will only recognize and discover the correct language to use and context to cover as time grants me the perspective necessary to do so; as I've experienced so far, it's a case-by-case explanation), is each dimension - not its contents. Each dimension consists of space, which is "nothing," the void in which its inverse exists. What it boils down to is this:
0 (point) x infinity x infinity x infinity = the third dimension, the dimension which hosts the tangible construct in which we exist. If one is capable of accepting that this familiar void is the result of "ascrib[ing] a dimension" to a lesser (the second) dimension, one might see that an identical transition exists between zero and one.
I've also very recently started towards a truth that, from the looks of it, may wind up being that all "superior" or "greater" dimensions exist wholly within the "lesser" dimensions. In such cases where I seek the correct answer regarding two such absolutes, I have found that either and both are correct answers.
Please keep in mind that portions of what I've published so far are my attempt to describe something that I do not yet fully comprehend. I will appreciate every question and contest you present; each will either (or both) serve to grant you a more complete understanding of what I am trying to communicate, or draw my attention to something that I have yet to realize or consider.
Post a Comment